75 lines
		
	
	
		
			3.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			75 lines
		
	
	
		
			3.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| 
 | |
| 1. PUT/POST without a known auth to use (possibly no auth required):
 | |
| 
 | |
|    (When explicitly set to use a multi-pass auth when doing a POST/PUT,
 | |
|    libcurl should immediately go the Content-Length: 0 bytes route to avoid
 | |
|    the first send all data phase, step 2. If told to use a single-pass auth,
 | |
|    goto step 3.)
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Issue the proper PUT/POST request immediately, with the correct
 | |
|    Content-Length and Expect: headers.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    If a 100 response is received or the wait for one times out, start sending
 | |
|    the request-body.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    If a 401 (or 407 when talking through a proxy) is received, then:
 | |
| 
 | |
|    If we have "more than just a little" data left to send, close the
 | |
|    connection. Exactly what "more than just a little" means will have to be
 | |
|    determined. Possibly the current transfer speed should be taken into
 | |
|    account as well.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    NOTE: if the size of the POST data is less than MAX_INITIAL_POST_SIZE (when
 | |
|    CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS is used), libcurl will send everything in one single
 | |
|    write() (all request-headers and request-body) and thus it will
 | |
|    unconditionally send the full post data here.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2. PUT/POST with multi-pass auth but not yet completely negotiated:
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Send a PUT/POST request, we know that it will be rejected and thus we claim
 | |
|    Content-Length zero to avoid having to send the request-body. (This seems
 | |
|    to be what IE does.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3. PUT/POST as the last step in the auth negotiation, that is when we have
 | |
|    what we believe is a completed negotiation:
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Send a full and proper PUT/POST request (again) with the proper
 | |
|    Content-Length and a following request-body.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    NOTE: this may very well be the second (or even third) time the whole or at
 | |
|    least parts of the request body is sent to the server. Since the data may
 | |
|    be provided to libcurl with a callback, we need a way to tell the app that
 | |
|    the upload is to be restarted so that the callback will provide data from
 | |
|    the start again.  This requires an API method/mechanism that libcurl
 | |
|    doesn't have today. See below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Data Rewind
 | |
| 
 | |
|    It will be troublesome for some apps to deal with a rewind like this in all
 | |
|    circumstances. I'm thinking for example when using 'curl' to upload data
 | |
|    from stdin. If libcurl ends up having to rewind the reading for a request
 | |
|    to succeed, of course a lack of this callback or if it returns failure, will
 | |
|    cause the request to fail completely.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    The new callback is set with CURLOPT_IOCTLFUNCTION (in an attempt to add a
 | |
|    more generic function that might be used for other IO-related controls in
 | |
|    the future):
 | |
| 
 | |
|      curlioerr curl_ioctl(CURL *handle, curliocmd cmd, void *clientp);
 | |
| 
 | |
|    And in the case where the read is to be rewinded, it would be called with a
 | |
|    cmd named CURLIOCMD_RESTARTREAD. The callback would then return CURLIOE_OK,
 | |
|    if things are fine, or CURLIOE_FAILRESTART if not.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Backwards Compatibility
 | |
| 
 | |
|    The approach used until now, that issues a HEAD on the given URL to trigger
 | |
|    the auth negotiation could still be supported and encouraged, but it would
 | |
|    be up to the app to first fetch a URL with GET/HEAD to negotiate on, since
 | |
|    then a following PUT/POST wouldn't need to negotiate authentication and
 | |
|    thus avoid double-sending data.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Optionally, we keep the current approach if some option is set
 | |
|    (CURLOPT_HEADBEFOREAUTH or similar), since it seems to work fairly well for
 | |
|    POST on most servers.
 |